www.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3

Testseek.com have collected 89 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3.
Award: Editor’s Choice September 2009
September 2009
 
(86%)
89 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
86 0 100 89

The editors liked

  • Quad Core performance
  • Price
  • Optimized for upcoming Windows 7
  • Reverse Compatibility
  • DDR2 and DDR3 Memory support
  • Inexpensive
  • Good performance for the price
  • Supporting motherboards are also inexpensive
  • Supports virtualization
  • Great pricing
  • Good performance
  • Low power consumption and heat
  • Good overclocking and great underclocking potential
  • Same list of technology support as Phenoms
  • Socket AM2/DDR2 compatibility
  • Cheap
  • Stable performance
  • 95W
  • Low power consumer

The editors didn't like

  • NONE!!
  • Noticeably slower than higher-end chips when running multicore-capable applications
  • Lower gaming performance
  • Not the best choice for die hard overclockers
  • High stock voltage
  • Overclocking
  • HDMI
  • DVI support

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-03, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  Dealing with current news means that we rarely have the opportunity to review old products and of course a comparison between the most recent products and those that came out several years ago can get a little problematic. But we’ve decided to push th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-13, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  I tested the system with only one case fan running and no discrete graphics card (the M4A785TD-M EVO’s IGP is an ATI HD 4200) to more accurately simulate a quiet home-media setup. Performance was..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-03, review by: overclock3d.net

  • It's difficult not to be impressed by the AMD Athlon II 620 X4. It provides a genuine 2.6GHz quad-core processor that will work perfectly well in either your current AM2+ motherboard, making it even more of a bargain, as it would provide 4 core goodness...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(87%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-03, review by: Bjorn3d.com

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-26, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • We really find it difficult to recommend the Athlon II X4 to anyone because it has very few redeeming features. Its very high power use for the minimal transistor count is strange and confusing: why is there the need to throw at hefty 1.4V through the ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-26, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  This makes it a good deal cheaper than the Intel Core 2 Q8200 that you won’t find for under $140 but which gives a similar level of performance! The AMD offer is by far the best here then. Of course in some rare cases..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-19, Author: Brian , review by: icrontic.com

  • Do we need processors that cost over $500 nowadays? To be perfectly honest, most people don’t. The most demanding task average consumers can throw at a computer is A/V content: They have 1080p AVC-HD video cameras, they have webcams, they have simple ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-13, review by: rbmods.com

  • Cheap, Stable performance, 95W , low power consumer
  • Overclocking
  • This is a pretty decent CPU, for 90$ you get alot of performance especially if you overclock the CPU a little bit. It performs better than 905e in stock performance and cost almost half the price. This CPU should do well in HTPC setups and even in nor...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×