ALL REVIEWS
BEST PRICES
ONE SITE!
                      Login   |   Register    
 
 
Find:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Nokia 6500 Classic



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews     User opinions     Image gallery    



Nokia 6500 Classic



Experts
71%
35 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.


Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.


Score this product:

  Conclusion   Order by:
 
Score
Reviewed by
  Published: 2008-03-28

Good:  Sleek, unusual looks, 1 GB of internal memory, sharp screen, Bluetooth 2.0 with EDR & A2DP profile
Bad:  No memory card slot, no FM tuner, uncomfortable alphanumeric keypad, expensive
Bottomline:  The Nokia 6500 Classic has the third edition of the Nokia Series40 UI. It is smooth to operate; it reminded me of the Nokia 5310 & 5610 XpressMusic phones, which have a similar UI. The stand-by app screen and the tab menu bring Symbian Series40 closer...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
50%



techtree.com

  Published: 2007-12-25

Abstract:  RM 1230 - 1260RM 980 - 1010 (AP)

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-



Mobile88.com

  Published: 2007-11-30

Good:  The Nokia 6500 Classic looks and feels marvellous.
Bad:  The camera isnt as good as that on the 6500 Slide.
Bottomline:  As a mid-tier 3G phone that looks the business, the Nokia 6500 Classic is true to its name.

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
80%



mobilechoiceuk.com

  Published: 2007-11-14

Good:  Gorgeous metallic slender frame. Expertly constructed. Stunning display. Skilled music player ...
Bad:  Average camera. Duff video recording quality. Limited memory...
Bottomline:  The 6500 Classic’s gorgeously sculpted body work is just about enough for us to overlook its feature failings. One for the sophisticated style hounds among you ...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
80%



stuff.tv

  Published: 2007-10-23

Abstract:  Just made commercially available, the Nokia 6500 classic is a sight for the sore eyes of thousands of slim-phone lovers, who had been quivering with anticipation. The new addition to the Nokia Series 40 team had us equally impatient to see what its capabl...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-



gsmarena.com

  Published: 2007-10-19

Bad:  Does not manage to reproduce standard video formats and codecs, Mediocre camera, No slot for an additional memory
Bottomline:  We are rather convinced that Nokia 6500 classic is not the phone you can use to make the perfect picture or to watch a superior-quality video. The device is not completely deprived of such capabilities, but it is not intended to impress with such feat...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
68%



phonearena.com

  Published: 2007-10-04, Author: Reuben Lee

Abstract:  While the thin-phone trend has been going on for quite a while now (first with the Motorola RAZR V3, then with the Ultra Edition series from Samsung), Nokia has been slow to adopt this form factor in its phones. It chose only to introduce the 6300 late...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-



asia.cnet.com

  Published: 2007-10-04

Abstract:  the 6500 Classic is a superb gadget, it has a splendid exterior and its features please the expectations of most people. It can be a serious alternative for those willing to choose the 6300 but miss 3G from it – it is true however that we won&#...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-

Award




mobilearsenal.com

  Published: 2007-10-03

Good:  Great looks, good call audio, solid music player features
Bad:  Weak reception
Bottomline:  The Nokia 6500 Classic has an impressive spec sheet. 1GB of internal storage memory, a 2 megapixel camera, and a very sleek and elegant form factor. It is also very solidly built. Not bad for a company that only very recently started making thin phones...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
75%



mobileburn.com

  Published: 2007-06-29

Abstract:  The image of the device had been finalized by December, first designs employed plastic. In February 2006 this device was tested out on a focus group in Moscow and several other cities. Apart from this model, they also showcased designs of Nokia 6300 an...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-



mobile-review.com

  Published: 2008-01-01

Abstract:  The long wait for slim phone lovers is over - the Nokia 6500 Classic is finally here. While other phone manufactures have been busy releasing a horde of slim-line models, Nokia have been relatively dormant since the Nokia 6230 handset a while ago. So t...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
-



iMobile.com.au

  Published: 2007-11-27

Good:  Sleek, stylish design; etched aluminium casing; 3G-capable; good call quality; 1GB internal memory
Bad:  No memory card slot, no 3.5mm headphone jack, unified microUSB port limits multitasking The Final Word The 6500 Classic is a well equipped 3G phone bursting with style. The lack of a memory card slot is a real let down, but it remains an excellent hand...
Bottomline:  The 6500 Classic is a well equipped 3G phone bursting with style. The lack of a memory card slot is a real let down, but it remains an excellent handset on the whole.

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
75%



goodgearguide.com.au

  Published: 2007-11-13

Good:  Slim and sturdy, Fast, intuitive interface, Dead-simple to use
Bad:  No expandable memory, Brain-teasing battery removal process, No shortcut keys
Bottomline:  A good choice for anyone who wants a reliable, no-fuss phone that will barely be noticeable in a pocket. ...

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
 
TS Score
80%



cnet.com.au

  Published: 2008-05-16

Good:  Gorgeous design; 3G; breeze to operate; 1GB storage; excellent voice quality
Bad:  Only 2-Megapixels; no video calling or microSD slot; disappointing battery life
Bottomline:  A killer handset in the mid-range market

Read the full review » 
 
Was this review helpful?
 
<